ON CBCP AND SSPX PRAYER FOR THE DEFENCE OF LIFE

'Madonna and Child', tempera and gold on panel painting by Bartolomeo Vivarini, ca. 1475

Anonymous said...

Father Abe,

Sa pangunguna ng SSPX eh nakiisa ang CBCP at ilang Cardinal gaya ni cardinal Vidal at Aniceto sa prayer for life... at maging ilang traditional blogspot na kasama sa Catholic Faith Defender... kayo po.. kailan po kayo magpopost ng ukol sa bagay na ito?

Nagtatanong lang po.

December 1, 2010 6:46 AM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

[Sa pangunguna ng SSPX]

PWEDE BA WAG MO KAMING GAGUHIN. ANG PRO-LIFE STRUGGLE AY NEVER NA PINANGUNAHAN NG SSPX. IYAN AY PINANGUNAHAN NI POPE PAUL VI NA WINALANG-HIYA NG SSPX. SI POPE PAUL VI AT SI JOHN PAUL THE GREAT ANG LEADERS NG PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT SA BUONG MUNDO NA NGAYON AY GINAGAMPANAN NI POPE BENEDICT XVI. DITO SA PILIPINAS MGA NOVUS ORDO PRIESTS SA PANGUNGUNA NI JAIME CARDINAL SIN ANG GUMAPI SA RH BILL MULA PANAHON NI MARCOS HANGGANG PANAHON NI GLORIA. AT NGAYON MGA PARI AT MADRE NG IGLESIA CATOLICA ANG NANGUNGUNA DIYAN.

ANG MGA LIDER NG SSPX AY BUSY SA PAGSALUNGAT SA MGA SANTO PAPA SA ASPETO NG LITURHIYA.

MATAGAL NA KAMING NAKIKIPAGLABAN SA PRO-LIFE HABANG ANG MGA SSPX AY WINAWALANG HIYA LAMANG ANG AMING MGA OBISPO AT SANTO PAPA.

[eh nakiisa ang CBCP at ilang Cardinal gaya ni cardinal Vidal at Aniceto sa prayer for life...]

KAHIT NA MUSLIM PA O BUDDHIST ANG TUMAWAG SA CBCP TALAGANG MAKIKIISA SILA. DAHIL HINDI NAMAN SILA MAKAHAYUP NA KAGAYA NG SSPX NA AYAW MAKIPAG-USAP SA IBANG PANANAMPALATAYA. THE FACT THAT THE CBCP JOINED THE SSPX IN PRAYER IT IS AN ACT OF GENEROSITY ON OUR PART BUT IT WAS NOT AN ENDORSEMENT OF THEIR LUCIFERIAN REBELLION AGAINST THE VATICAN II AND THE PAULINE MASS. NO, NO, NO... MAMAMATAY ANG MGA SSPX NG DILAT TULAD NI LEFEBVRE SUBALIT ANG PAULINE MASS AY MANANATILI.

ANG KAPAL NG MUKA NILA. DI BA PARA SA MGA SSPX AY MODERNISTS ANG MGA BISHOPS NAMIN? TAPOS NGAYON AY NAKIKISALAMUHA SILA SA MGA MODERNISTS IN ORDER TO DEODORIZE THEIR STINKING SOCIETY... TO GAIN A FACADE OF ACCEPTABILITY IN THE CHURCH.

YOU ARE USERS.

[at maging ilang traditional blogspot na kasama sa Catholic Faith Defender...]

TALAGA? ALING BLOGSPOT?

[kayo po.. kailan po kayo magpopost ng ukol sa bagay na ito?]

NAPAKARAMI KO NANG NAI-POST ABOUT RH BILL AT PRO-LIFE ISSUES DITO. KUNG SA MGA SSPX LANG NAMAN E DIHAMAK NA MAS MARAMI AKONG NAGAGAWA FOR THE DEFENSE OF LIFE.

ANG KAPAL NGA NG MUKA NILA. NAGPA-ROSARY LANG E KALA MO MARAMI NANG NAGAWA. HE, HE, HE...

ISA PA, HINDI NAMAN SILA DAPAT PAG-UKULAN NG ATENSIYON DAHIL KOKONTI. IILANG MGA BALIW LANG ANG TAGA-SUNOD NILA. MAS MARAMI SA KANILA NG SAMPUNG DOBLE ANG MGA KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS O ANG CATHOLIC WOMEN'S LEAGUE.

[Nagtatanong lang po.]

SUMASAGOT DIN LANG.

December 1, 2010 10:57 AM

REFUTING THE SILLY ARGUMENT OF AN ISLAM LEADER AGAINST THE BIBLE

Moses in Prayer

Anonymous said...

good afternoon father! i saw 1 video of an islam leader saying our bible is not true. he tells one of the reasons why: in the last part of the book written by Moses, it says, "...moses died..." the islam leader then said how can a man who died have written that he died? it should have been. if he was the writer of that book, the it should have been "... I died...." but then again how can he write if he's dead?. father, this is just one of his reasons. can you enlighten me please. thanks!

November 29, 2010 4:05 PM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

[good afternoon father!]

GOOD AFTERNOON TOO.

[i saw 1 video of an islam leader saying our bible is not true.]

THAT ISLAM LEADER DEFINITELY IS WRONG.

[he tells one of the reasons why: in the last part of the book written by Moses, it says, "...moses died..." the islam leader then said how can a man who died have written that he died?]

THAT IS HIS MISTAKE. THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS NOT TEACHING THAT THE SO-CALLED BOOKS OF MOSES AS WE HAVE THEM NOW ARE WRITTEN BY MOSES VERBATIM. RATHER WE ARE TEACHING THAT THE TEACHINGS AND IDEAS WERE HANDED DOWN BY GOD THROUGH MOSES. THUS, IT CONTAINS VALUABLE INFORMATION THAT ONLY MOSES RECEIVED FROM GOD.

ON THE OTHER HAND, WE ARE ALSO RECOGNIZING THE FACT THAT THERE ARE HISTORICAL NARRATIVES CONTAINED IN THOSE BOOKS. THOSE PARTS MUST HAVE BEEN WRITTEN BY HISTORIANS OF THE HEBREW PEOPLE OR PRIESTLY SCHOLARS IN THE TEMPLE LATER ON. THUS, THERE ARE PASSAGES THAT SIMPLY NARRATES WHAT HAD HAPPENED TO MOSES AS IF HE WAS A MERE SUBJECT OF THE NARRATIVE RATHER THAN THE ONE WRITING A PERSONAL TESTIMONY.

IT IS NOT A PROBLEM FOR US CATHOLICS. IN FACT, EVEN THE GOSPELS OF JESUS WERE NOT WRITTEN PERSONALLY BY JESUS. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES WERE NOT ORIGINALLY WRITTEN BY THE ACTUAL TWELVE APOSTLES.

TO INSINUATE THAT A THING IS WRONG BECAUSE IT IS NOT WRITTEN BY THE PERSON CONCERNED IS ILLOGICAL. BECAUSE EVEN IN COURT TESTIMONIES OF OTHERS ARE ACKNOWLEDGED AND THERE IS SUCH A THING AS OFFICIAL BIOGRAPHY. OTHERS COULD WRITE SOMETHING WHICH IS A VALID TESTIMONY ABOUT A PERSON EVEN IF THE ACTUAL PERSON WAS NOT THE AUTHOR ITSELF.

[it should have been. if he was the writer of that book, the it should have been "... I died...." but then again how can he write if he's dead?. father, this is just one of his reasons.]

THAT IS WHY THE CHURCH IS TEACHING US THAT IN INTERPRETING THE SACRED SCRIPTURES WE HAVE TO CONSIDER THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT AND THE NATURE OF THE DOCUMENTS. IN THE PENTATEUCH OR THE FIVE BOOKS OF MOSES THERE ARE PARTS PRESENTING THE ACTUAL WORDS OF MOSES AND THERE ARE PARTS THAT WERE WRITTEN BY LATER HISTORIANS OR SCHOLARS WHOSE WORKS HAD BEEN INSPIRED BY THE HOLY SPIRIT.

THE ARGUMENT IS VALID ONLY IF WE ARE TEACHING THAT MOSES WROTE PERSONALLY THE ACTUAL BOOK. NO, WE ARE SAYING THAT THEY ARE COLLECTIONS OF THE FAITH TESTIMONIES OF MOSES AND THE HEBREW PEOPLE OF THAT TIME.

[can you enlighten me please. thanks!]

HOPE THIS WILL HELP. GOD BLESS YOU!

November 29, 2010 8:23 PM

PRAYER VIGIL FOR THE NASCENT HUMAN LIFE

The Madonna and Child, the Blessed Virgin nourishes her Child by her own body

COME & JOIN !!!!

Prayer Vigil for the Nascent Human Life

DATE: November 27, 2010

TIME: 5:30 PM

VENUE: EL SHADDAI GROUNDS

Amvel City Compound, Parañaque

Pope Benedict has earlier called on all Catholics to join the prayer vigil for “All Nascent of Human Life” on the eve of the first Sunday of Advent which will be celebrated in all dioceses and parishes.

P R O G R A M

5:30 PM ………….. INTRODUCTION

6:00 PM……..... EXPOSITION OF THE BLESSED

SACRAMENT & HOLY ROSARY

7:00 PM ………….. TESTIMONY

7: 30 PM …………. HOLY MASS

9:00 PM…………… VIGIL PROPER

Its time to unite our stand and get involved in the most important role you can ever have as a Baptized Catholic, Following Gods command to spread the One True Faith. Defend Mother Church and be counted in this battle for LIFE from womb to tomb against all its threats.

Bihar election results 2010 live | bihar election results

Bihar Election result is came.updated result is given below

 According to the current sources the NDA is in the winning position

17:52 IST : Bihar Assembly polls results a new trend where caste has not played any role: Ficci Secretary General Amit Mitra 
17:45 IST : Janak Singh (BJP) beats Tarkeshwar Singh (INC) in Taraiya
17:43 IST : Vinod Narain Jha (BJP) beat Mahesh Prasad Singh (LJP) in Benipatti 
17:38 IST : Bihar Election results ends myth: BJP
17:36 IST : Current trends: JDU-113, BJP-91, RJD-22, LJP-4, Congress-5, Others-8
17:29 IST : Results of the Bihar assembly elections a victory of optimism over despair and victory of hope over fear: BJP
17:25 IST : Lalu Prasad-Rabri Devi voted out from Bihar Assembly

party	trends	Results
NDA	2	203
RJD+LJP	1	24
INC	0	5
others	0	8

SA PAGANO BA ANG OBELISK NG CATHOLIC CHURCH SA ROME?

The Obelisk at St. Peter's Square is clearly free of hierographs of Egyptian gods and goddesses.

The Obelisk at the center of St. Peter's Square. It is put right on the spot where St. Peter the Apostle was martyred for the faith by crucifixion.

Christian Pilar said...

father, ask ko lang po about sa obelisk sabi po kasi ng frend kong born again meron daw tayong mga katoliko na obelisk o sundial sa rome. sa mga pagano daw po ang mga ganon katulad ng ancient egypt at sa paganong sumasamba daw po sa araw. bakit daw po tayo may ganon? ibig sabihin daw po ba pagano daw po ang mga katoliko?

Christian Pilar of Malabon

November 23, 2010 7:43 PM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

ANG OBELISK AY ISANG BATONG MONUMENTO LANG. ITO AY NAGIGING PAGANO LAMANG DAHIL SA MGA LARAWAN NA NAKAUKIT DITO NA NAGBIBIGAY DANGAL SA MGA DIOS DIOSANG PAGANO O KAYA SA REBULTONG PAGANO SA TUKTOK NITO.

ANG OBELISK NATIN SA ROME AY WALANG NAKA-UKIT NA LARAWAN NG DIOS-DIOSAN NG MGA PAGANO. ANG NAKALAGAY SA TUKTOK AY KRUS NA SAGISAG NG PAGLILIGTAS NI CRISTO. KAYA NGA DINALA SA ROMA ANG OBELISK NA NASA ST. PETER SQUARE PARA IPA-MUKA NAG IGLESIA CATOLICA ANG VICTORY AND TRIUMPH OF CHRISTIANITY OVER PAGANISM. DAHIL ANG OBELISK NILA AY GINAWA LAMANG TUNTUNGAN NG KRUS NI CRISTO. CHRIST REIGNS VICTORIOUS OVER PAGAN DEITIES OF EGYPT, GREECE AND ROME.

November 23, 2010 8:13 PM

Pope Benedict Advocates Right Sexuality, NOT CONDOM USE, in Fight against HIV

Pope Benedict XVI

• 11/21/2010 Catholic News Agency (www.catholicnewsagency.com)

Concentrating on the use of the condom only serves to trivialize sexuality.

Excerpts of Pope Benedict XVI's new book are already causing a stir. Though some media reports claim he offers a change in papal teaching about condom use, Pope Benedict in fact says that a humanized sexuality, not condoms, is the right response to HIV.Elsewhere in the excerpts, Pope Benedict describes himself as a beggar who relies on his friendship with the Lord, Mary and the saints to live his vocation. His life without Christian joy would be unsupportable, he declares.

VATICAN CITY (CNA/EWTN News) - Excerpts of Pope Benedict XVI's new book are already causing a stir. Though some media reports claim he offers a change in papal teaching about condom use, Pope Benedict in fact says that a humanized sexuality, not condoms, is the right response to HIV.

The Nov. 21 edition of the Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano (LOR) will release excerpts of the pontiff's book "Light of the World: The Pope, the Church and the Signs of the Times."

The book contains the Pope's responses to questions from Peter Seewald, a German reporter who spoke with him over a week last summer about the most sensitive and important questions in Church life today.

The themes treated in the book are edgy and the reception of the Pope's words is likely to be varied, but his answers offer a unique look into his teachings and his perspective on the Church and the world.

In the excerpts offered in LOR, just two brief paragraphs provide the Pope's response to a question on sexuality in the world today. He says that concentrating on the use of the condom only serves to trivialize sexuality.

This trivialization leads many people to no longer see sex as an expression of love, but as a self-administered drug. The fight against the banalization of sexuality is part of a great effort to change this view to a more positive one.

According to one much-commented excerpt printed in L'Osservatore Romano, the Pope concedes that there can be single cases in which the use of a condom may be justified.

He uses the example of prostitutes who might use prophylactics as a first step toward moralization, that is, becoming moral. In such a case, condom use might be their first act of responsibility to redevelop their consciousness of the fact that not everything is permitted and that one cannot do everything one wants.

While secular outlets such as Time Magazine characterized this remark as "a stunning turnaround" for the Church, Pope Benedict goes on to explain that this is not the true and proper way to defeat HIV. Instead what is necessary is the humanization of sexuality.

Elsewhere in the excerpts from the forthcoming book, the pontiff speaks of the footprint of Judaism, Islam and Christianity in the modern world.

He also expresses his shock at the extent of the sexual abuse of minors in the Church and the evident wish of mass media to discredit the Church for these abuses rather than purely to investigate the truth.

He warns that true tolerance can fall victim to current misunderstandings of the concept. He also speaks of the destruction of families, young people and society due to drug consumption.

Another controversy Pope Benedict addresses is whether the ordination of women to the Catholic priesthood is possible.

In brief, Pope Benedict says that it is not a question of responding to the wishes of the people, but a question of whether the Church has the power to ordain women. Repeating the words of John Paul II from a 1994 document on the priesthood, he said the Church "has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women."

He explains that following Christ's establishment of Church leadership on the foundation of the original 12 male apostles is a question of obedience. It is perhaps one of the most difficult aspects to obey, he explains, but this is what makes it important.

The Church is not an arbitrary regime, he comments, and the priesthood is supposed to be a form of service and not domination. Even though it might be difficult, the Church follows the Lord's will and cannot be molded to the wishes of individuals.

The function of women in the Church is too significant to speak of discrimination, says the Pope, who notes the importance of historic figures such as Mary, Monica and Mother Teresa.

Women are so important, he says, that in many ways they define the face of the Church more than men.

Elsewhere in the excerpts, Pope Benedict describes himself as a beggar who relies on his friendship with the Lord, Mary and the saints to live his vocation. His life without Christian joy would be unsupportable, he declares.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows | harry potter and the deathly hallows movie

harry potter and the deathly hallows movie is one of the best Entertaining movie.This film got 70 points outof 100.Harry potter is seventh part.

The New York Times said by this movie "“The movie, in other words, belongs solidly to Mr. Radcliffe, Mr. Grint and Ms. Watson, who have grown into nimble actors, capable of nuances of feeling that would do their elders proud".

New York Magazine also explaine about Harry potter is "Hallows’s first hour is deadly, all right".

This week best entertainment week.

PINABAYAAN BA NG MGA JESUITS ANG BANGKAY NI JOSE RIZAL MATAPOS ANG EXECUTION?

Philippine National Hero, Dr. Jose Rizal - The Pride of the Malay Race

Loriedhel said...

Mr. Arganiosa bakit po hindi na inasikaso ng mga paring heswita ang bangkay ng bayaning si Rizal pagkatapos na sya ay patayin sa Firing Squad? Dahil ba sa tapos na ang sinasabi nyong retraksyon kaya ng ihatid si Rizal sa bagumbayan para barilin wala ng pakialam ang Simbahang Katoliko sa katawan ni Rizal at ilibing sa Paco Cemetery ng walang kabaong at baliktarin pa ang initials ni Rizal para magkaroon ng confusion? ito ang nakasulat sa retraksyon ni Rizal mula sa wikipedia

"I retract with all my heart whatever in my words, writings, publications and conduct have been contrary to my character as a son of the Catholic Church."

sabi ni Rizal sya ay anak ng simbahang Katoliko pero bakit sa oras ng kamatayan ni Rizal iniwan na sya ng mga Paring Heswita at pinabayaan malibing sa libingan sa Paco ng wala man lang kabaong ganyan ba magmahal ang sinasabi nyong INANG SIMBAHANG KATOLIKA sa kanyang mga anak?

nagtatanong lang po.

November 13, 2010 1:11 PM

Loriedhel said...

Mr. Arganiosa hindi ka po sumagot sa tanong ko tungkol sa Retraksyon ni Rizal, at sa walang pakialam na Iglesia Katolika sa katawan ng Bayani pagkatapos barilin sa Bagumbayan at ilibing sa Sementeryo ng Paco ng wala man lang Kabaong. Oo nga naman walang pakialam ang Iglesia Katolika dun dahil nasa hurisdiksiyon ng Pamilya ni Rizal yun. Pero sana man lang bilang isang mabuting Kristyanong Iglesia Katolika na pinagbalik-looban ni Rizal bago sya patayin e, sana hiningi ng mga Paring Heswita sa Gobyerno ng Espanya na kunin ang Katawan ni Rizal at ibigay sa Pamilya nila. Katulad ng ginawa ba ni Apostol San Juan sa Katawan ng Panginoong Hesukristo na hiningi ang permiso kay Pilato upang kunin ang katawan ng Panginoon at mailibing ng maayos. For sure kung yun ang ginawa ng Iglesia Katolika sa katawan ng Bayani e di maituturing nga na mabuting Kristyanong Simbahan nga ang Iglesia Katolika. Hindi nyo maitatanggi na wala na ang mga Paring Heswita na naghatid kay Rizal sa Bagumbayan kasi nasa isang old Portrait of Rizal's Execution andun pa ang mga Pari ng nakatutok na kay Rizal ang mga armas.(naka-itim pa ang mga Pari at naka-gora na sambalilo)

hindi ko na kayo pipilitin kung sasagutin nyo ang tanong ko o hindi pero sana isipin nyo ang kawawang kalagayan ni Rizal sa unang libingan nya sa Paco. ika nga ni Balagtas "ang mga Bayani ng aking Bayan ay inililibing ng walang Kabaong." Natupad kay Rizal.

hindi kaya "Hands-off" na ang Iglesia Katolika kay Rizal kasi tapos na ang problema nila. Gawa na ang Retraksyon, at matitigil na ang pang-eerehe ni Rizal sa Simbahang Katolika at lalabas na hindi sya 1st Class na Bayani katulad ng napanood ko sa GMA7 way back a year ago.

November 15, 2010 10:09 AM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

[Mr. Arganiosa bakit po hindi na inasikaso ng mga paring heswita ang bangkay ng bayaning si Rizal pagkatapos na sya ay patayin sa Firing Squad?]

SINONG BALIW ANG NAGSABI SA IYO NA HINDI INASIKASO NG MGA PARING HESWITA ANG BANGKAY NI RIZAL AFTER THE FIRING SQUAD? ABA'Y HAKA-HAKA MO LAMANG IYAN.

ANG TUTUO KAHIT ANG PAMILYA NI RIZAL AY HINDI PINALAPIT NG GOBIERNO SA BANGKAY NI RIZAL HANGGANG SA ITO AY MAILIBING. KAYA NGA NAGLIBOT PA ANG KANYANG MGA KAPATID PARA HANAPIN ITO AT NAKITA ITONG NAKALIBING NA AT MAY BANTA NA GUARDIA CIVIL:

"He was secretly buried in Pacò Cemetery in Manila with no identification on his grave. His sister Narcisa toured all possible gravesites and found freshly turned earth at the cemetery with guards posted at the gate. Assuming this could be the most likely spot, there never having any ground burials, she made a gift to the caretaker to mark the site "RPJ", Rizal's initials in reverse." [WIKIPEDIA]

KUNG ANG PAMILYA NI RIZAL AY HINDI HINAYAANG ASIKASUHIN ANG KANYANG BANGKAY MGA HESWITA PA KAYA NA HINDI NIYA KAANO-ANO? BAKIT YUNG MGA MANALO, SORIANO, VILLANUEVA, MGA ATEISTA SA U.P. AT MGA COMMUNISTA, PATI MGA MASON E HINDI NILA INASIKASO ANG BANGKAY NI RIZAL?

IKAW, NASAAN KA NUON? DAPAT INASIKASO NG LOLO MO ANG BANGKAY NI RIZAL.

[Dahil ba sa tapos na ang sinasabi nyong retraksyon kaya ng ihatid si Rizal sa bagumbayan para barilin wala ng pakialam ang Simbahang Katoliko sa katawan ni Rizal]

HA, HA, HA... PINAKIKITA MO LAMANG SA AMIN ANG IYONG KATANGAHAN. ANG RETRACTION NI RIZAL AY GINAWA SA HARAP NG MARAMING SAKSI AT ITO AY DOCUMENTADO. ANG KANYANG HULING SALITA AY GALING SA BIBLIANG LATIN NG CATHOLIC CHURCH:

"His last words were those of Jesus Christ: "consummatum est",--it is finished." [WIKIPEDIA]

ANG DENIAL NG RETRACTION NI RIZAL CAME ONLY MANY YEARS AFTER HIS DEATH AT ITO AY BASE LANG SA HAKA-HAKA NA HINDI NAGBABAGO NG ISIP SI RIZAL. SUBALIT ANG MGA DOCUMENTO AT MGA SAKSI AY UNANIMOUS:

"On the other side of the debate are Catholic church leaders, and historians such as Austin Craig,[3] Gregorio Zaide,[39] Ambeth Ocampo,[38] Nick Joaquin,[40] and Nicolas Zafra of UP.[41]" [WIKI]

ANG MGA HISTORIANS NAMIN AY NAGPRESENTA NG MGA DOCUMENTO NA SULAT KAMAY NI RIZAL. ANG MGA HISTORIANS NINYO AY LAWAY LANG ANG PUHUNAN SA DENIAL. HA, HA, HA...

"They state that the retraction document was deemed authentic by Rizal expert, Teodoro Kalaw (a 33rd degree Mason) and "handwriting experts...known and recognized in our courts of justice," H. Otley Beyer and Dr. José I. Del Rosario, both of UP.[41]" [WIKI]

AYAN, KITAM. PATI MGA EXPERTS AY UNANIMOUS. YUNG MGA NAGDEDENY AY MGA BALIW TULAD MO. NABUBUHAY SA HAKA-HAKA.

"They also refer to the 11 eyewitnesses present when Rizal wrote his retraction, signed a Catholic prayer book, and recited Catholic prayers, and the multitude who saw him kiss the crucifix before his execution." [WIKI]

KITAM, MAYROONG 11 WITNESSES. MERON PANG HANDWRITTEN DOCUMENT, MY SIGNED PRAYER BOOK PA. THEN NAGDASAL NG CATHOLIC PRAYERS: ACTUALLY DOCUMENTED DIN NA NAGKUMPISAL, NAGSIMBA AT NAGCOMMUNION SI RIZAL BEFORE HE DIED. HE, HE, HE... HUMALIK PA SA CROSS.

ANO ANG KATIBAYAN MO NA HINDI TUTUO YAN. ASAN ANG DOCUMENTO MO NA SULAT KAMAY NI RIZAL NA HINDI SIYA BUMALIK SA CATOLICO.

"A great grand nephew of Rizal, Fr. Marciano Guzman, cites that Rizal's 4 confessions were certified by 5 eyewitnesses, 10 qualified witnesses, 7 newspapers, and 12 historians and writers including Aglipayan bishops, Masons and anti-clericals.[42]"

HA, HA, HA... YUN NAMAN PALA E. PATI MGA MASON, AGLIPAYAN, ANTI-CATHOLICS REPORTED AND CERTIFIED THE CONVERSION E. BAKIT KA NAGMAMAGALING? HA, HA, HA...

"One witness was the head of the Spanish Supreme Court at the time of his notarized declaration and was highly esteemed by Rizal for his integrity.[43]"

IMAGINE, PATI ANG CHIEF JUSTICE NA HINAHANGAAN NI RIZAL AY NAGPATUNAY SA RETRACTION. HE, HE, HE... SINO ANG EYEWITNESS MO? SI SATANAS?

"Because of what he sees as the strength these direct evidence have in the light of the historical method, in contrast with merely circumstantial evidence, UP professor emeritus of history Nicolas Zafra called the retraction "a plain unadorned fact of history."[41]"

IT IS A FACT BEING DENIED BY THE 'IMFACTOS'!!!

"Fr. Guzman attributes the denial of retraction to "the blatant disbelief and stubbornness" of some Masons.[42]"

KAHIT KAPWA NILA MASON NA NAGPAPATOTOO AYAW NILANG PANIWALAAN. WALA SILANG BAIT SA SARILI.

[at ilibing sa Paco Cemetery ng walang kabaong at baliktarin pa ang initials ni Rizal para magkaroon ng confusion? ito ang nakasulat sa retraksyon ni Rizal mula sa wikipedia]

HE, HE, HE... HINDI MO GINAGAMIT ANG UTAK MO PAG NAGBABASA KA E. ANG PAMILYA NGA NI RIZAL E HINDI SILA ANG NAGLIBING KAY RIZAL. IBIG SABIHIN BA NON PINABAYAAN NG PAMILYA RIZAL ANG BANGKAY NI PEPE? HE, HE, HE...

"I retract with all my heart whatever in my words, writings, publications and conduct have been contrary to my character as a son of the Catholic Church."

[sabi ni Rizal sya ay anak ng simbahang Katoliko pero bakit sa oras ng kamatayan ni Rizal iniwan na sya ng mga Paring Heswita at pinabayaan malibing sa libingan sa Paco ng wala man lang kabaong ganyan ba magmahal ang sinasabi nyong INANG SIMBAHANG KATOLIKA sa kanyang mga anak?]

HINDI SIYA PINABAYAAN NG MGA HESWITA. ANG MGA HESWITA AY KASAMA NG KANYANG PAMILYA AT PARE-PAREHO SILANG HINDI PINALAPIT NG GOBIERNO SA BANGKAY NI PEPE RIZAL. KAYA KAHIT PAMILYA NI RIZAL HINDI ALAM KUNG SAAN SIYA INILIBING DAHIL KINUHA ANG KANYANG BANGKAY. LATER NA LAMANG ITO NAKITA.

November 18, 2010 6:47 PM

HOW COME PHILIPPINE MARTYRS GOMBURZA AND THE GOOD-HEARTED HEROINE MELCHORA AQUINO ARE NOT VENERATED AS SAINTS?

Melchorra Aquino, popularly known as Tandang Sora - the Mother of Philippine Revolution. Inset, the three Catholic priests who were killed for their love of country: Fr. Gomez, Fr. Burgos and Fr. Zamora - GOMBURZA.

Ian Joseph Riñon said...

Pero may question po ako, Fr. Abe....

Bakit po hindi kinonsider ang GOMBURZA na mga martir ng Simbahan dahil pinapatay sila kahit wala naman silang kasalanan? Ang sabi ng prof namin sa Rizal Course, even the Archbishop of Manila at that time was condemning this execution. Pero dahil wala syang temporal power, at kahit nagmakaawa itong wag ipapatay ang GOMBURZA, wala syang magawa kundi pakiusapan nilang pasuotin ng abito ang tatlo hanggang sa huling sandali ng kanilang paglilingkod sa Diyos.

November 17, 2010 10:06 PM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

Dear Bro. Joseph Ian,

THE GOMBURZA WERE NOT DECLARED MARTYRS OF THE FAITH BECAUSE THEY DIED FOR POLITICAL REASONS NOT BECAUSE OF 'THE HATRED OF THE FAITH'. THEY DIDN'T DIE BECAUSE OF REFUSAL TO DENY JESUS CHRIST OR ANY OF THE MAJOR TENETS OF THE CATHOLIC FAITH.

THEY ARE POLITICAL MARTYRS AND HEROES BUT NOT SAINTS.

November 17, 2010 10:41 PM

Anonymous said...

IF that is the case, then the probability of Melchora Aquino being made a saint is higher compared to these priests because she practiced charity towards the katipuneros. I think that would be good grounds for heroic values

November 17, 2010 11:42 PM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

Dear Anonymous,

Melchora Aquino or our dear TANDANG SORA can only be declared a saint of charity if it is proven that she did those works of charity because of her Catholic Faith. If it is not for faith then it is not Charity but mere social work. She was doing those things for political reasons as well.

Another point to consider is that we have to determine if she was really a Catholic. Because there is a possibility that she was a Mason or an Aglipayan. If she is any of these two then she didn't belong to the Catholic Church and will not be considered a heroine of faith.

It is not enough to practice good works to be saints. It is necessary that the motivation is truly the Catholic Faith and not exclusively the political or social factors.

November 18, 2010 7:34 AM

Jim Swilley, Georgia Megachurch Pastor video

William and Kate Middleton Are Engaged

William and Kate Middleton Are Engaged have announced.While no date has been revealed, it is thought the ceremony will be held in a few months and be the biggest since William's mother, Diana, married Prince Charles. 

ANNOUNCEMENT: NEW CATHOLIC FAITH DEFENDERS [CFD] WEBSITE

Isahel said...

Hi Fr. Abe,

Pa advertise naman sa blog mo Fr.Abe, meron na kami ngayong CFD website:

www.catholicfaithdefender.weebly.com

viewers can drop their questions sa Q & A section, meron din downloadable apologetic materials, links to online resources, forum at blog which is linked to your blog and Bro. Marwil's blog. Thanks Fr. God Bless!

November 16, 2010 10:16 PM

Dexter Season 5 Episode 8

Take It! also called Dexter...
which was written by Manny Coto & Wendy West aired last night on Showtime.
It has been about a month now since Lumen has been rescued by Dexter from her captors/rapists and it was still not clear what role she was going to play in our favorite serial killer’s life.
This week we got a clear answer as we watched the duo became real partners in crime by sharing their first kill.

In “Take It!” Dexter we followed the couple as they attended a self help seminar put together by Jordan Chase and rented a room in the same hotel in order to kill Cole.

Eric Johnson football fame leads wedding with Jessica Simpson | Eric Johnson football fame leads wedding with Jessica Simpson with Eric Johnson

Jessica Simpson is engaged with Eric Johnson.Eric Johnson is a Football player.These are said by representative of simpson on last sunday.

They moved to New york and start a new life.

the reports were confirmed by People magazine today. Johnson has clearly demonstrated his love for the multi-talented Simpson. Yesterday, Simpson was witnessed with a giant diamond ring on her finger. Also, Johnson was seen with Simpson in Italy celebrating … 

REFUTING A PROTESTANT CLAIM THAT CATHOLIC TEACHING IS COMPLICATED

Text of an Old Catechism depicting through art the Creation Narrative.

Dax Lagos said...

Father Abe good day.

Please comment on this: "You Catholics are so complicated. The bible is not complicated. The teachings are just very clear and easy to understand. The apostles, the evangelists and other inspired writers did write what was only comprehensible except for a few. You (Catholics) make things so vastly and gigantically complicated when you make your Catechism of the Catholic Church."

I've hear it from a protestant apologist over a radio program.

Thanks Father Abe for answering. God bless

November 14, 2010 3:26 PM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

[Please comment on this: "You Catholics are so complicated.]

WE ARE NOT COMPLICATED IN FACT OUR FAITH AND OUR WORSHIP ARE CODIFIED AND PUBLISHED. THE PROTESTANTS ARE COMPLICATED BECAUSE EVERY FELLOWSHIP AND GROUP IS HAVING THEIR OWN SET OF DOCTRINES AND MANNER OF WORSHIP.

PROTESTANTISM IS A THEOLOGICAL BABEL.

[The bible is not complicated. The teachings are just very clear and easy to understand.]

THAT IS WHY WE HAVE PROPAGATED THE BIBLE ALL OVER THE WORLD. SO THAT THOSE PEOPLE WILL HAVE EASY ACCESS TO IT AND CAN EASILY ENJOY ITS SPIRITUAL NOURISHMENT. IF THAT PROTESTANT IS THINKING THAT HE IS THE ONLY ONE READING THE BIBLE THEN HE IS A FOOL BECAUSE WE CATHOLICS ARE USING THE BIBLE MORE THAN A THOUSAND YEARS BEFORE PROTESTANTISM.

[The apostles, the evangelists and other inspired writers did write what was only comprehensible except for a few.]

HOW COME THE PROTESTANTS INVENTED DOCTRINES THAT ARE NOT FOUND IN THE BIBLE:

1. JUSTIFICATION BY FAITH ALONE

2. BIBLE ALONE

3. RAPTURE

4. ONCE SAVED WILL ALWAYS BE SAVED

5. ALTAR CALL

6. OBLIGATORY TITHING

7. GOSPEL OF PROSPERITY

AND MANY OTHERS.

[You (Catholics) make things so vastly and gigantically complicated when you make your Catechism of the Catholic Church."]

ON THE CONTRARY THE FACT THAT WE HAVE A CLEAR PUBLISHED MANUAL OF DOCTRINE MANIFESTS THAT WE HAVE A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF OUR FAITH. THE PROTESTANTS CANNOT PRODUCE A UNIFIED MANUAL OF FAITH BECAUSE THEY ARE CONFUSED AMONG THEMSELVES.

AND BESIDES, HE IS A HYPOCRITE. THE PROTESTANTS ALSO HAVE MANUALS OF FAITH. THERE IS A SET OF DOCTRINES FOR LUTHERANS, ANGLICANS, MORMONS HAVE THEIR ADDITIONAL BIBLE, THE SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTS THEY HAVE THE BOOKS OF ELLEN GOULD WHITE TO GUIDE THEM.

[I've hear it from a protestant apologist over a radio program.]

THAT ONE IS OUT OF TOUCH WITH REALITY.

November 14, 2010 8:25 PM