Pro-life group hits Akbayan for malicious tirade vs. Sotto

 

MANILA,
August 24, 2011–A pro-life organization on Wednesday criticized a
partylist group for waging a vicious social networking demolition job on
Sen. Vicente “Tito” Sotto III, saying its claims were “narrow-minded”
and “out of context.”

In a statement on the group’s website, Filipinos For Life (F4L)
said, “Sotto was merely questioning the basis of the oft-repeated
statistic of 11 maternal deaths a day, in the context of a legislative
debate on a bill that seeks to establish a wide-ranging national
policy.”

“It is therefore fair to examine the basis of this bill. There is nothing to apologize for,” the F4L statement said.

“In the first place, there was no derogatory statement on women, and
the sarcasm, if at all, is directed at pro-RH lobby groups, some of them
pro-abortion, that routinely peddle this statistic. The supposed
offense is in the creative, nay, malicious imagination of Akbayan’s
propagandists,” the group said.

It also criticized former Akbayan Rep. Risa Hontiveros-Baraquel for maligning Sotto.

“May we remind former Rep. Risa Hontiveros-Baraquel to elevate the
level of the debate on RH. Her repeated references in social networks to
an incident decades ago involving a dead movie starlet are uncalled for
and below the belt,” it said.

F4L said that based on its own estimates, the correct figure is 4.8
maternal deaths a day, based on 2008 data from the National Statistics
Office and the National Statistical Coordination Board.

“This assumes a maternal mortality ratio (MMR) of 99 per 100,000 live
births and 1.784 million live births in 2008. Assuming a high MMR of
169 per 100,000 live births, the figure is 8.3,” the group said.

F4L clarified that it does not downplay the problem of maternal
deaths, stating that “it is a problem that needs concrete solutions,
like more birthing centers and midwives. But we should guard against the
excessive emotional use of the outdated statistic to influence
Philippine government policy.”

The group chided Akbayan for covering up the dangerous side effects of contraceptives.

“If Akbayan is really pro-women, it should tell its women
constituents that contraceptive pills that would be distributed for free
under the RH bill are considered by a WHO agency as a Level 1
carcinogen. Pills, according to reputable literature produced by
entities such as the US National Cancer Institute and the Mayo Clinic
increase the risk of breast and other cancers.”

“If Akbayan really is pro-women, it should tell mothers that the
pills it wants them to ingest daily could expel a fertilized ovum, which
is already a human being. It should inform women that pills don’t
always prevent ovulation,” it continued. “In case the pills do not
prevent ovulation and fertilization occurs, the pills have been proven
to create an environment that is hostile to the beginning of life.
Akbayan’s lawmakers should be reminded of what the Constitution says
about the protection of the unborn.” (CBCP for Life)