Jesus and the Twelve Apostles
-
5. How can we trace that a tradition that is not found in the Bible was taught by Word (2 Thessalonians 2:15)? I want to know your answer here. Since I can't verify and those that I found usually were teachings started centuries after the Apostles died, so I think it's safer to refer to Scriptures alone especially if that teaching or tradition that is not in the Bible is not really crucial.
6. If there are traditions that are not in the Bible, can you name some of them? Priests today were not allowed to be married, but Peter had a wife, and it's not bad to have a wife. Is it a tradition? Immaculate conception for example appears to contradict Romans 3:23 "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God".
7. If I believe that God's authority and wisdom are absolute and way bigger than anything, I will treasure His words the same way. If I believe that God is above all and the only ONE who is Holy, way way higher than the Pope, I will see the scriptures the same way, thus I believe in Sola Scriptura.
8. Believing in Sola Scriptura does not mean hating the preachers. We hate preachers who teach things apart from the Gospel as Paul in Galatians 2:14 rebuked Peter for not following the Gospel: "But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?". Peter seems to start a new 'tradition' or 'teaching', but Paul corrected Peter. What was Paul's basis? It's the truth of the gospel. The apostles are not perfect, they are sinners too. They need each other to correct each other, that's why they belong to the Church preaching the truth of the gospel.
9. If the truth of the gospel is important and crucial, I believe the apostles won't missed preaching and writing about it. If we don't believe in Sola Scriptura, then it's partly saying God's word is incomplete or cannot stand on its own or is not sufficient. It is not the apostles who merely documented what had happened, they wrote because they were inspired.
10. 2 Timothy 3:16 says that "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness". John 4:23-24 says "23 Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. 24 God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth." and John 17:17: "Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth."... I think the Scripture is enough for me to worship God in truth and in Spirit. We will be safer in following the Scripture and practicing the traditions that were written in the Scriptures.
Salamat po sa time po sa pagbabasa, maraming oras din po ang ginugulo ko para ayusin ko po yung thoughts ko po sa taas. Hindi ko po ito ginagwa na prang may 'talo' at may 'panalo'. Ginagwa ko po ito pra mas makita ko po yung truth tungkol po sa Sola Scriptura, at gnun din naman po upang mapakinabangan po ng iba. Paano ko po malalamang tama, kung hindi ko po shinashare po sa iba, gayun din po paano ko po masasabing mali...
- Fr. Abe, CRS said...
.jpg "Fr. Abe, CRS")
-
[5. How can we trace that a tradition that is not found in the Bible was taught by Word (2 Thessalonians 2:15)?]
THIS IS A STUPID QUESTION. ILLOGICAL.
FIRST, YOU ARE ASKING ME ABOUT 'A TRADITION NOT FOUND IN THE BIBLE' TO BE TAUGHT BY WORD ACCORDING TO 2 THES. 2:15. THAT IS CONTRADICTORY. YOU ALREADY DECLARED IT AS 'NOT FOUND IN THE BIBLE' THEN YOU STUPIDLY ASK ME HOW IT CAN BE TAUGHT BY WORD IN 2 THES. 2:15.
YOU ARE TRYING TO BE CLEVER HUH. HA, HA, HA... BOPOL.
[I want to know your answer here.]
THE ANSWER IS THAT YOUR QUESTION IS STUPIDLY CONSTRUCTED. IT IS IDIOTIC TO ASK SOMEONE TO FIND IN THE BIBLE SOMETHING THAT IS BY PREMISE IS NOT IN THE BIBLE. THAT'S FOUL.
IT IS LIKE ASKING ME: "WHERE CAN YOU FIND IN THE BIBLE THE MAN THAT CANNOT BE FOUND IN THE BIBLE?"
[Since I can't verify and those that I found usually were teachings started centuries after the Apostles died, so I think it's safer to refer to Scriptures alone especially if that teaching or tradition that is not in the Bible is not really crucial.]
YOU CANNOT VERIFY BECAUSE OF SOLA SCRIPTURA. SOLA SCRIPTURA HINDERS YOU IN VERIFYING THINGS.
THE ONE THAT CAN VERIFY IS OF COURSE THE CHURCH FOUNDED BY JESUS. BECAUSE THE TEACHINGS OF THE LORD IS NOT EXCLUSIVELY ENTRUSTED TO THE BIBLE BUT TO THE CHURCH AS THE PILLAR AND GROUND OF TRUTH. BOTH THE WRITTEN AND THE ORAL TRADITION ARE ENTRUSTED TO THE TEACHING AUTHORITY OF THE CHURCH.
THE BIBLE CANNOT VERIFY THINGS FOR YOU BECAUSE IT IS NOT THE ONE GIVEN THE POWER TO BIND AND TO LOOSE FOR THE PEOPLE OF GOD.
-
[6. If there are traditions that are not in the Bible, can you name some of them?]
I AM NOT NECESSITATED TO DO THAT BECAUSE ALL CATHOIC DOCTRINES ARE BIBLICAL. BUT, THE BIBLE DOES NOT TEACH SOLA SCRIPTURA. THE FACT THAT THE TEACHINGS OF THE CHURCH IS ENTIRELY BIBLICAL DOES NOT LEGITIMIZE SOLA SCRIPTURA BECAUSE SOLA SCRIPTURA IS UNBIBLICAL.
I DON'T KNOW OF ANY CATHOLIC DOCTRINE THAT IS NOT BIBLICAL BUT I KNOW THAT YOUR SOLA SCRIPTURA IS DEMONICALLY UNBIBLICAL. IT'S OBVIOUS... YOUR SOUL IS TURNING INSIDE YOUR BELLY ALREADY BUT YOU CANNOT GIVE A SINGLE VERSE THAT SUPPORTS SOLA SCRIPTURA.
THERE IS NO NEED FOR ME TO GIVE AN EXAMPLE OF A TRADITION THAT IS NOT FOUND IN THE BIBLE. OUR TEACHING IS THAT THE FAITH HANDED ON TO US BY THE APOSTLE IS BOTH WRITTEN AND ORAL. THAT'S IT. AND WE HAVE A BIBLICAL SUPPORT FOR THAT. WHILE YOU CANNOT GIVE ANY VERSE FOR YOUR DEMONIC SOLA SCRIPTURA. HE, HE, HE...
[Priests today were not allowed to be married,]
IDIOT. THEY ARE ALLOWED. THEY CAN GET MARRIED 'IF THEY WANT.' THERE ARE SOME PRIESTS WHO GOT MARRIED AND THEY ARE FREE TO DO SO. THAT IS THEIR DECISION. HA, HA, HA... LIAR, LIAR, LIAR...
-
[but Peter had a wife,]
PETER HAD A WIFE BUT HE ABANDONED IT FOR THE SAKE OF CHRIST:
Luke 18:28-30 Then Peter said, Lo, WE HAVE LEFT ALL, and followed thee. And he said unto them, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that HATH LEFT house, or parents, or brethren, or WIFE, or CHILDREN, for the kingdom of God's sake, Who shall not receive manifold more in this present time, and in the world to come life everlasting.
HA, HA, HA... PETER LEFT 'ALL' FOR THE KINGDOM OF GOD. AND JESUS DIDN'T REPRIMAND PETER. INSTEAD THE LORD SAID THAT THOSE WHO HAD LEFT WIFE OR CHILDREN OR HOME FOR THE KINGDOM OF GOD SHALL BE BLESSED HERE ON EARTH AND BE GIVEN ETERNAL LIFE. SO, JESUS WILL BLESS THOSE WHO DIDN'T MARRY FOR THE SAKE OF THE KINGDOM.
JESUS WILL BLESS THE CELIBATES YET YOU DEMONICALLY ATTACK THE DECISION OF OUR PRIESTS TO BE CELIBATE.
NOW, IF IT IS EVIL NOT TO GET MARRIED FOR PRIESTS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT THEN JESUS WILL BECOME A SINNER FOR YOUR STANDARD BECAUSE JESUS IS THE HIGH PRIEST OF THE NEW COVENANT. JESUS DIDN'T MARRY A WOMAN BUT HE MARRIED HIMSELF TO THE CHURCH. AND THAT IS THE EXAMPLE OUR PRIESTS ARE FOLLOWING.
YOUR PASTORS ARE ENDULGING IN THE FLESH OF THEIR WIVES WHILE OUR PRIESTS ARE FOLLOWING THE EXAMPLE OF JESUS THE LAMB:
Rev 14:4 These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb.
THE MALE VIRGINS SHALL BE BLESSED BY GOD IN HEAVEN. WHILE YOU AND YOUR KIND DEMONICALLY REJECT THEM. OBVIOUSLY YOU ARE IGNORANT OF THE FACT THAT THE BIBLE TEACHES THAT SOME ARE NOT MARRYING FOR THE SAKE OF THE KINGDOM OF GOD:
Matthew 19:12 [Good News Bible] "For there are different reasons why men cannot marry: some, because they were born that way; others, because men made them that way; and others do not marry for the sake of the Kingdom of heaven. Let him who can accept this teaching do so."
YOU SEE. YOU HAVE BEEN FOUND BLIND AND STUPID AGAIN. YOU ARE IGNORANT OF THE FACT THAT THE BIBLE TEACHES THAT SOME ARE NOT MARRYING FOR THE SAKE OF THE KINGDOM OF GOD. HA, HA, HA...
THEN, YOU MENTIONED PETER AS HAVING A WIFE. HOW ABOUT PAUL, IS HE MARRIED? HOW ABOUT JOHN? PHILIP, JUDE, BARTHOLOMEW, SIMON, JAMES, MATTHEW? ARE THEY MARRIED? CHAPTER AND VERSE PLEASE. HE, HE, HE...
HOW ABOUT MATTHAIAS? BARNABAS? TIMOTHY AND TITUS? SILAS? ARE THEY MARRIED? CHAPTER AND VERSE PLEASE.
BEFORE YOU MENTION SOMETHING MAKE IT SURE THAT YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE MENTIONING.
[and it's not bad to have a wife.]
- IT IS NOT BAD TO HAVE A WIFE BUT IT IS NOT OBLIGATORY FOR ALL TO HAVE A WIFE.
WHO IS THE DEMON WHO TOLD YOU THAT IT IS BAD TO HAVE A WIFE? THERE ARE MORE MARRIED CATHOLICS IN THE WORLD THAN MARRIED PROTESTANTS BECAUSE IT IS IN PROTESTANT COUNTRIES WHERE DIVORCE, ABORTIONS, CONTRACEPTION AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGES ARE ACCEPTED AND LEGALIZED FIRST. IN BORN AGAIN AMERICA YOUR WIFE TODAY WILL BE THE WIFE OF YOUR NEIGHBOR TOMORROW. YOUR CONCEPT OF MARRIAGE IS PROPER FOR DOGS.
[Is it a tradition?]
YES. IT IS TRADITION AND IT IS ALSO BIBLICAL. JESUS THE HIGH PRIEST IS NOT MARRIED TO A WOMAN BUT TO THE CHURCH HIS BRIDE. WE FOLLOW HIS EXAMPLE. WE DO NOT INDULGE TO THE FLESH OF WOMEN AS YOUR PASTORS DO.
[Immaculate conception for example appears to contradict Romans 3:23 "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God".]
THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION IS THE SAME. IT IS TRADITION AND IT IS BIBLICAL. IT IS FOUNDED ON GEN. 3:15 THAT THE MOTHER OF THE MESSIAH WHO WILL DESTROY THE HEAD OF THE SERPENT WILL BE IN 'ENMITY WITH SATAN - THE SERPENT'.
JESUS IS NOT SUBJECT TO ROM 3:23 BECAUSE HE IS GOD. GOD EXEMPTED MARY FROM SINNING BECAUSE HE FILLED HER WITH GRACE ALREADY [Luke 1:28] AND SAVED HER ALREADY [Luke 1:47].
THERE IS NO VERSE IN THE BIBLE THAT STATES MARY HAS COMMITTED ANY SIN. WHAT IS MARY'S SIN? MARY IS THE HIGHLY FAVORED OF GOD [Luke 1:28]. GOD FAVORS HERE SO HIGHLY BECAUSE SHE IS A WOMAN OF FAITH AND RIGHTEOUSNESS AS EFFECTS OF GOD'S SPECIAL GRACE.
-
[7. If I believe that God's authority and wisdom are absolute and way bigger than anything,]
GOD'S WISDOM IS ABSOLUTE AND BIGGER THAN ANYTHING. THAT IS WHY IN HIS WISDOM HE DIDN'T WRITE "BIBLE ALONE" OR SOLA SCRIPTURA IN THE BIBLE. WHY? BECAUSE HE IS NOT HERETICAL LIKE LUTHER AND HE IS NOT STUPID LIKE YOU.
[I will treasure His words the same way.]
WE TREASURE GOD'S WORD. AND FORTUNATELY THE WORD OF GOD DOES NOT TEACH SOLA SCRIPTURA SO WE SPIT IT OUT. THE LORD GOD WROTE THROUGH ST. PAUL ABOUT TRADITIONS BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN SO WE ACCEPT THE BIBLE AND ORAL TRADITION.
UNFORTUNATELY YOU ARE UPHOLDING SOLA SCRIPTURA WHICH IS UNBIBLICAL.
[If I believe that God is above all and the only ONE who is Holy, way way higher than the Pope, I will see the scriptures the same way, thus I believe in Sola Scriptura.]
GOD IS HIGHER THAN THE POPE, THE WORD OF GOD IS HIGHER THAN THE POPE. THE POPE IS A SERVANT OF GOD AND OF HIS WORD. THAT IS WHY THE POPE HATES SOLA SCRIPTURA BECAUSE IT IS UNBIBLICAL.
YOU ARE LOWER IN HELL BECAUSE YOU UPHOLD A DOCTRINE THAT IS NOT GIVEN BY THE BIBLE. YOU ALLOW YOURSELF TO BE DECEIVED BY SATAN WHO TAUGHT YOU THROUGH MARTIN LUTHER. YOUR SOUL IS IN DANGER FOR KEEPING A MERE TRADITION OF MAN.
-
[8. Believing in Sola Scriptura does not mean hating the preachers.]
REALLY? HA HA HA... SO YOU BELIEVE THE SCRIPTURES AND THE PREACHERS TOGETHER. SO WHEN YOUR PREACHERS DEMONICALLY PREACH SOLA SCRIPTURA DO YOU BELIEVE THEM EVEN IF YOU KNOW THAT THE DOCTRINE IS NOT FOUND IN THE BIBLE. HA, HA, HA... YOU WILL GO TO HELL TOGETHER FOR THAT HERESY.
[We hate preachers who teach things apart from the Gospel]
YEAH, SOLA SCRIPTURA IS APART FROM THE GOSPEL AND THE BIBLE ENTIRELY. SO YOU ARE TEACHING THING APART FROM THE GOSPEL. WHERE IN THE GOSPEL CAN YOU FIND SOLA SCRIPTURA?
[as Paul in Galatians 2:14 rebuked Peter for not following the Gospel: "But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel,]
O NO, NO, NO... PAUL DIDN'T SAY THAT HE SPOKE AGAINST PETER BECAUSE PETER DIDNT FOLLOW THE GOSPEL. EXCUSE ME. THAT IS BEYOND THE TEXT. PAUL REPRIMANDED PETER BECAUSE OF HIS ATTITUDE AND IMPROPER CONDUCT. BUT IT WAS NOT A DOCTRINAL ERROR... IT WAS NOT VIOLATION OF THE TEACHING OF THE SCRIPTURES. EATING OR NOT EATING WITH GENTILES IS NOT DOCTRINAL ERROR AND NOT VIOLATION OF THE GOSPEL PRECEPTS. IT IS MERE MATTER OF PROPER CONDUCT BEFORE THE JEWS AND THE GENTILES.
[I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?".]
SO, WHERE IS THE VIOLATION OF THE GOSPEL THERE? IS LIVING AFTER THE MANNER OF THE GENTILES ALREADY A VIOLATION OF THE GOSPEL? WHICH PRECEPT OF THE GOSPEL DID PETER VIOLATE?
[Peter seems to start a new 'tradition' or 'teaching',]
THIS IS JUST YOUR HALLUCINATION. PAUL DIDN'T EVEN MENTION THE WORD TEACHING OR TRADITION. YOU DEMONICALLY INVENT THINGS TO SUIT YOUR DEMONIC SOLA SCRIPTURA. HA, HA, HA... NO, NO, NO... DON'T MANIPULATE THE BIBLE TO FAVOR THE UNBIBLICAL. HA, HA, HA...
LOOK AT PETER, HE WAS SILENT AS A LAMB. HE WAS FULL OF HUMILITY. HE DIDN'T FIGHT WITH PAUL. ONLY A HUMBLE AND VIRTUOUS PERSON CAN REACT LIKE THAT WHEN BEING REPRIMANDED IN PUBLIC. THAT IS CHRISTIAN VIRTUE.
[but Paul corrected Peter.]
IN MATTERS OF DEALING BETWEEN JEWS AND GENTILES NOT ON MATTERS OF DOCTRINE. PETER DIDN'T TEACH ANY ERRONEOUS DOCTRINE. DID HE? WHERE? CHAPTER AND VERSE PLEASE.
[What was Paul's basis?]
CERTAINLY, PAUL USED HIS AUTHORITY AS AN APOSTLE. DID PAUL QUOTE THE BIBLE FOR AUTHORITY? NO.
PAUL DIDN'T RELY ON THE BIBLE BUT ON HIS OWN AUTHORITY AS A LEADER OF THE CHURCH. THE SAME THING FOR PETER WHEN HE WAS DOING HIS MINISTRY FOR GOD.
[It's the truth of the gospel.]
IDIOT. IT IS NOWHERE STATED THERE THAT PAUL CORRECTED PETER ON MATTERS OF THE TRUTH OF THE GOSPEL.
[The apostles are not perfect,]
WHO IS THE DEVIL WHO TOLD YOU THAT THE APOSTLES ARE PERFECT? THE CATHOLIC CHURCH NEVER TAUGHT THAT THE APOSTLES ARE PERFECT. SO, YOU ARE OUT OF TOUCH WITH REALITY. HELLO! GET REAL! HA, HA, HA....
[they are sinners too.]
WE ARE NOT SAYING THAT THEY ARE NOT SINNERS. WE KNOW THAT THEY ARE SINNERS. WE ALWAYS PRESENT THE LIVES OF THESE SAINTS EITHER ON STAGE OR IN FILMS AND IN BOTH WE ALSO HIGHLIGHT THEIR SINFULNESS AND ALSO HOW THE LORD SANCTIFIED THEM BY HIS GRACE.
[They need each other to correct each other, that's why they belong to the Church preaching the truth of the gospel.]
WE DO NOT TEACH THAT THE APOSTLES DO NOT NEED EACH OTHER. OF COURSE THEY NEED EACH OTHER. BUT WHETHER THEY NEED EACH OTHER OR NOT, WHETHER THEY ARE SINFUL OR NOT DO NOT GIVE BIBLICAL SUPPORT FOR SOLA SCRIPTURA. YOUR DOCTRINE IS STILL DEMONICALLY UNBIBLICAL. HA, HA, HA...
-
[9. If the truth of the gospel is important and crucial, I believe the apostles won't missed preaching and writing about it.]
CORRECT. SINCE SOLA SCRIPTURA IS NOT PREACHED OR WRITTEN ABOUT BY THE APOSTLES IT MEANS IT IS NOT IMPORTANT. THE APOSTLES WERE NOT INSPIRED BY THE HOLY SPIRIT TO WRITE ABOUT SOLA SCRIPTURA. HA, HA, HA...
[If we don't believe in Sola Scriptura, then it's partly saying God's word is incomplete or cannot stand on its own or is not sufficient.]
O NO, NO, NO... JESUS DIDN'T TEACH SOLA SCRIPTURA. THE APOSTLES DIDN'T BELIEVE AND TEACH SOLA SCRIPTURA. THEREFORE YOUR CLAIM IS ANTI-BIBLICAL. IT IS A DEMONIC CLAIM. IT IS HERETICAL.
[It is not the apostles who merely documented what had happened, they wrote because they were inspired.]
THEY WROTE BECAUSE THEY WERE INSPIRED. AND THEY WERE NOT INSPIRED TO WRITE ABOUT SOLA SCRIPTURA. THE HOLY SPIRIT INSPIRED THE APOSTLES NOT TO WRITE ABOUT SOLA SCRIPTURA. HA, HA, HA...
-
[10. 2 Timothy 3:16 says that "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness".]
YES. BUT 2 TIM. 3:16 DIDN'T SAY THAT BECAUSE SCRIPTURES ARE GOD-BREATHED THEREFORE WE MUST BELIEVE IN SCRIPTURES ALONE. NO, NO, NO... HA, HA, HA...
[John 4:23-24 says "23 Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. 24 God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth."]
OUT OF THE TOPIC. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ISSUE. WHERE IN THE TEXT DOES IT SAYS: "WORSHIPPING GOD IN SPIRIT IS BELIEVING IN SOLA SCRIPTURA"? HA, HA, HA...
YOU ARE QUOTING TEXTS OUT OF DESPERATION. STUPEEEED!!!
[and John 17:17: "Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth."...]
HA, HA, HA... IT DOES NOT SAY: "SANCTIFY THEM BY BIBLE ALONE". HA, HA, HA... ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS OUT OF THE TOPIC. STUPEEEED!!! HA, HA, HA...
[I think the Scripture is enough for me to worship God in truth and in Spirit.]
REALLY? WHERE IS THAT IN THE BIBLE? WHERE CAN YOU FIND IN THE BIBLE THAT SCRIPTURES ARE ENOUGH TO WORSHIP GOD IN TRUTH AND IN SPIRIT? CHAPTER AND VERSE PLEASE.
YOU SATANICALLY INVENTS TEACHING THAT IS NOT BIBLICAL. HOW DARE YOU.
[We will be safer in following the Scripture and practicing the traditions that were written in the Scriptures.]
BUT YOU WILL NOT BE SAFE UPHOLDING SOLA SCRIPTURA BECAUSE IT IS UNBIBLICAL AND MERELY INVENTED BY MARTIN LUTHER. FOR THAT YOUR SOUL IS IN DANGER OF GOING TO HELL.
-
[Salamat po sa time po sa pagbabasa, maraming oras din po ang ginugulo ko para ayusin ko po yung thoughts ko po sa taas.]
SALAMAT DIN. KASI NAKITA NAMIN NA NAGTATAGUMPAY NA ANG AMING PAGTATANGGOL SA ARAL NG SANTA IGLESIA. IMAGINE, TANGGAP MO NA ANG BIBLE AT ANG SACRED TRADITIONS NA COMPATIBLE AT HINDI MAGKASALUNGAT. HA, HA, HA... WE GAINED A LOT FOR THAT. HA, HA, HA...
[Hindi ko po ito ginagwa na prang may 'talo' at may 'panalo'.]
OBVIOUS NAMAN.
[Ginagwa ko po ito pra mas makita ko po yung truth tungkol po sa Sola Scriptura, at gnun din naman po upang mapakinabangan po ng iba.]
KITANG KITA NAMIN NA HINDI MO NAPATUNAYAN NA NASA BIBLIA ANG SOLA SCRIPTURA. WALANG WALA. HINDI UMUBRA ANG BAD BREATH THEOLOGY MO. HA, HA, HA...
[Paano ko po malalamang tama, kung hindi ko po shinashare po sa iba, gayun din po paano ko po masasabing mali...]
NAKITA NAMING MALING-MALI AT MASAMA ANG SOLA SCRIPTURA KASI ANTI-BIBLE AT ANTI-TRADITION. UNBIBLICAL AT ILLOGICAL ANG SOLA SCRIPTURA.
No comments:
Post a Comment