Friday, September 17, 2010

ANTI-CATHOLIC LIES AND DECEPTIONS IN QUOTING CATHOLIC BOOKS AND DOCUMENTS, Part 6 "My Catholic faith" by Louis Laravoire Morrow part 3 p.255

The Page Cover of My Catholic Faith, my personal copy of the classic Catholic Catechism which is for sale in Totus Bookstore in Greenhills. This book can also be orderered online.


Page 254 of My Catholic Faith showing that the topic being discussed is SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM and NOT THE LAST SUPPER OF LEONARDO DA VINCI.


Page 255 of My Catholic Faith showing the continues explanation of THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM AND NO MENTION AT ALL OF THE LAST SUPPER OF LEONARDO DA VINCI.


Now, the lying devil who is hiding on the pseudo-name JEREMY REYES and JASON ABALOS once again made deceptive claims concerning the book MY CATHOLIC FAITH. Here is his message:



The Last Supper of Leonardo da Vinci in the DINING HALL of SANTA MARIA DELLE GRAZIE in Milan, Italy. It is put in the Dominican Convent's Refectory or Dining Hall not in the Church and not for Worship.




sa aklat katoliko;





"My Catholic faith" by most rev. Louis Laravoire Morrow part 2 p.255





"It said that the model the great artist leonardo da vinci used for the figure of jesus christ in his painting 'The Last Supper' was a young man of exceptional beauty,whose countenance expressed innocence and purity in a remarkable degree.Some years after,when leonardo da vinci was ready to draw the figure of judas the traitorous apostle,he had a diffucult time trying to find amodel.So he went into the most disreputable haunts of the city,to seek a suitable model he saw all sorts of criminals,immoral men altogether lost to all sence of decency,but still was not satisfied.At last one day he spied a wreck of a man,slinking in a corner of low resort.His face had an expression so vicious and diabolical that the artist knew his search for a model for judas was ended.going near,he prevailed upon the fellow, with the offer of sum of money,to sit as amodel.The series of sittings was about to end,when one day leonardo da vinci said,"you know,since you came ,i have always had a feeling that i have seen you somewhere before i must be wrong,but the feeling persists...'There upon the man in the outburst of despair cried.'yes,you have seen me before! i was innocent young man who sat as model for the figure of the christ there...and now,see how i am sitting for judas,for judas...'





sa tagalog;



"Sinasabing ang modelong ginamit ng dakilang pintor na si LEONARDO DA VINCI sa kanyang paglalarawan kay KRISTO sa guhit niyang 'ANG HULING HAPUNAN' ay isang binatang may di pangkaraniwang kagandahan na may anyong nangungusap na kawalang malay at katapatan.Pagkaraan ng ilang taon,ng handa ng iguhit ni leonardo da vinci ang katawan ni hudas ang taksil na apostol,nahirapan siyang humanap ng modelo.Kaya't naparoon siya sa dako na pinamumugaran ng kasamaan,sa mga dakong pinagtitipunan ng pinakamasasamang kriminal,upang makatagpo ng isang nababagay na modelo.Nakita niya ang lahat ng uri na ganap ng nawalan ng lahat ng damdamin ukol sa kagandahang asal,ngunit di pa rin siya nasiyahan.Sa wakas isang araw ay minatyagan niya ang isang taong, wala ng kabuluhan na tumalilis sa sulok ng isang bahay aliwan,ang kanyang mukha ay may anyong mapanganib at mala dyablo kaya't natiyak ng pintor na tapos na ang kanyang paghahanap ng modelo para kay hudas.Nang lumapit siya,napangsang ayon niya ang lalake sa alok ng isang malaking halaga ng salapi upang umupo bilang modelo.Ang sunod sunod na pag upo ay halos matatapos na,ng isang araw ay sinabi ni leonardo da vinci,"Alam mo,mula ng dumating ka,para bang nakita na kita noon sa isang dako.Maaaring akoy nagkakamali,ngunit ang aking damdamin ay mapilit...'Dahil dito ang tao sa pagbulalas niya ng kanyang kawalan ng pag asa ay sumigaw."Oo nakita mo na ako noon! Ako yaong walang malay na binata na umupo bilang modelo para sa larawan ng cristo roon...At ngayon,tingnan mo kung paano ako umuupo para kay hudas,para kay hudas..."


_______________________




ayon sa aklat nio, ang larawan ni cristo jan na hawak hawak ng iglesia katolika ngayon,ay HINDI NAMAN TLAGA YAN ang larawan ni CRISTO! Si leonardo da vinci ay gumamit ng modelo pra kay cristo, na sa kalaunan ang modelong ginamit kay 'cristo' ay siya rin modelo na ginamit rin kay hudas 'ang taksil na postol' "The same model" pala...





ang totoo wala naman talaga nakakuha ng LARAWAN ng panginoong jesus sa simula pa,dahil nga mahigpit ang pagbabawal sa pagsamba sa LARAWAN o DIOS DIOSAN.



Ang tanong sino ba yung tao na yun na modelong ginamit ni leonardo da vinci???



sa aklat katoliko pa rin na isinulat ng paring katoliko;



"Mga butil na Ginto" ni R.P. Gerardo Maximo,p.120-121



"Ang dalawang "Modelo" sa Huling Hapunan ni Leonardo da Vinci."



"Isang kataka-taka at nakapangingilabot na pangyayari ang kasaysayan ng balitang "huling hapunan,"ang masterpiece ni leonardo da vinci.Matapos maiguhit ni leonardo ang labing isang apostol ay nangangailangan siya ng isang angkop na "modelo" kay hesus ng kanyang kuwadro.Sa mahaba niyang paghahanap ay natagpuan niya ang isang binatang umaawit sa koro ng katedral sa milan na nagngangalang PIETRO BANDENELI.Ang Pietrong ito ay isang ulirang estudyante,anak ng isang nakakariwasa sa buhay datapwat higit sa lahat ay isang masunuring anak na gumaganap ng tungkuling katoliko.Sa isang salita ay may ulirang ugali,ulirang katoliko at laging nasa grasya ng diyos.Inanyayahan niya sa kanyang "estudio" at ng mailarawan ang estudyante ay labis na nasiyahan si leonardo pagkat angkop na angkop sa larawan ng kanyang hesus sa kuwadro.Makaraan ang ilang buwan ay pagud na pagod naman siya sa paghahanap ng isang "modelo" sa hudas ng kanyang kuwadro.Sa isang paglalakad niya sa lansangan ng roma ay nakasalubong siya ng isang taong pangit,mabalasik ang pagmumukha,matatalim ang mga mata,mahaba ang balbas,anupat larawang tunay ng isang "desperado".Inakala ni leonardo na ang taong ito ay angkop sa kanyang hudas.Inanyayahan niya at ang taong ito ay sumama naman.Nang ang tao o Hudas na "modelo" ay dumating sa kanayang "estudio" ay nagpalinga-linga,tumingin sa lahat ng sulok at pagkatapos ay tumitig sa balitang pintor.Ito ay nagtanong -Ano ang inyong napapansin sa aking estudio? Hindi po bago sa aking paningin ang inyong estudio.Ako ay napanhik na rito,nakaupo na sa luklukan ito ay kinunan na ninyo ang larawan noong ako ay estudyante pa.-Ah kayo ang si G. Pietro Bandeneli, "Ang modelo" ng Hesus sa aking kuwadro? Opo ako nga.Ngunit anong laki ng inyong ipinagbago! Isinalaysay ng naging estudyante ang kanyang malungkot na kasaysayan.Naging alibughang anak;nilustay ang kanyang kayamanang minana,nilustay ang lusog na katawan,naging laman ng sugalan at taberna...naging latak ng pinunan...At ngayon ay kagaya ni Hudas...isang desperado."



jeremy;


yan palang modelo ni leonardo na CRISTO at HUDAS ay si PIETRO BANDENELI.



FR.ABE may tanung ako sa inyo? yang bang kasaysayan na yan tungkol sa larawan daw ni cristo alam nio??



ilagay ko man ang sarili ko bilang katliko,syempre di ko sasambahin ang larawan ni HUDAS dahil masama siya eh taksil siyang apostol! sa larawan ako syempre ni cristo sasamba,fr.abe ang problema e SIYA RIN YUN EH..SAME MODEL NGA SILA EH,



kya kung ang isang katoliko ay nakaluhod sumasamba sa larawan ni diumano ni CRISTO,sumasamba rin siya at nakaluhod larawan ni HUDAS ang taksil na apostol...



di ako naninira fr.abe DOKUMENTADO lahat yang ipinost ko na mga aklat ninyo..



salamat......


Image of Christ from early Christian Catacombs, 375 AD


It is striking that this alleged Jeremy Reyes or Jayson Abalos has appeared again after his lies and deceptions have been proven beyond any reasonable doubt. Atty. Marwil Llasos, the Catholic Faith Defenders and myself have challenged this animal to come out of his veiled darkness and face us publicly showing his proofs. But to no avail. This demon is hiding like jackal and cunningly staying in the dark like a serpent. THE CURSE OF GOD IS UPON HIM WHO IS LYING WITH HIS OWN TONGUE. May the Holy Spirit grant the virtue of honesty and sincerity to this one before it will be too late for his soul.


Mosaic of Christ in Ravenna, 6th Century AD


Another lie that he is claiming now is that the Image of Christ that the Catholics are using is based on the same model used by Leonardo da Vinci. THE IDIOT IS NOT AWARE OF THE FACT THAT THE CATHOLIC CHURCH HAS IMAGES OF CHRIST IN CATACOMBS ARTS, ICONS AND MOSAICS HUNDREDS OF YEARS BEFORE THE BIRTH OF LEONARDO DA VINCI. To claim that the Catholic Church relied on the model and painting of Leonardo is a manifestation of Gross Ignorance and guilty of historical distortion. And the worst is that he is demonically parroting his lies through the titles of our books bearing the names of our priests despite the fact that the real books do not contain what he claimed to have been written therein. I hereby posted here samples of those images in Icons and Mosaics to prove the shallowness of his argument. Leonardo's image of Christ cannot be the model of Catholic Iconography of the Savior because the artist lived only during the 15th-16th century... too late to be the originator because by that time the Iconography of Christ is already well-advanced.



Icon of Christ in Mount Athos' St. Catherine Monastery, 6th century AD. Today the St. Catherine Monastery belongs to the Orthodox Church but this Icon was made when the Orthodox and the Catholic Church were still fully united.




The demon has the courage to claim that there is a Tagalog version of the Catholic Faith when there is none. Then, his claim that the Catholic images of Christ which we are using in our Churches are patterned after Pietro Bandeneli is once again a proof of his delusion because the story that Leonardo da Vinci found out later that the model he used for Christ later on became the same model he employed for Judas Iscariot. Ha, ha, ha... The demon is free to hallucinate as long as he want but we know that the story is a myth, a black legend: "A common rumour surrounding the painting is that the same model was used for both Jesus and Judas. The story often goes that the innocent-looking young man, a baker, posed at nineteen for Jesus. Some years later Leonardo discovered a hard-bitten criminal as the model for Judas, not realizing he was the same man. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT LEONARDO USED THE SAME MODEL FOR BOTH FIGURES and the story usually overestimates the time it took Leonardo to finish the mural." [WIKIPEDIA]






Mosaic of Christ in Hagia Sophia, Constantinople. This is 11th century AD


Another thing to bear in mind is that THE LAST SUPPER PAINTING OF LEONARDO IS NOT COMMISSIONED TO BE USED IN CATHOLIC CHURCH BUT FOR A DINING HALL. Ha, ha, ha... Thus, it is never used by the Catholic Church for worship and adoration. THE LAST SUPPER OF LEONARDO IS A MURAL ON A DOMINICAN CONVENT'S DINING HALL. For that reason, the replica of this painting is commonly used by Catholics in their refectories and dining halls to remind them of the Lord's Supper while they were eating. Much more, when Leonardo was commissioned to paint that mural the place was designed for a mauseleum of the Sforza family: "The Last Supper measures 450 × 870 centimeters (15 feet × 29 ft) and covers the back wall of the dining hall at the monastery of Santa Maria delle Grazie in Milan, Italy. The theme was a traditional one for refectories, although the room was not a refectory at the time that Leonardo painted it. The main church building had only recently been completed (in 1497), but was remodeled by Bramante, hired by Ludovico Sforza to build a Sforza family mausoleum. The painting was commissioned by Sforza to be the centerpiece of the mausoleum." [WIKIPEDIA]






Another mosaic of the Lord Jesus in Hagia Sophia, 13th cent. AD

ang totoo wala naman talaga nakakuha ng LARAWAN ng panginoong jesus sa simula pa,dahil nga mahigpit ang pagbabawal sa pagsamba sa LARAWAN o DIOS DIOSAN.



Ha, ha, ha... You were not able to get the image of the Lord Jesus because your religion is FAKE and NEWLY INVENTED. The early Christians knew the image of Christ because they were drawing him on woods and stones, in icons and later on mosaics. DO NOT INCLUDE US IN YOUR EMPTINESS.

Don't accuse us of worshipping the images because we do not. The image of Christ is not an image of an idol. The Image of Christ is the Image of our Lord and Savior.

No comments:

Post a Comment